Art becomes interwinded with people's lives in many ways, especially because nowadays its definition keeps broadening, and it is accessible to everyone, sometimes even without any special effort put into reaching it, as it surrounds us. Is there anyone who has not been intrigued by a photoshoot seen in a random newspaper, or who could not stop humming a song heard while on their way to work?
But, obviously, art is not just something we randomly encounter only to forget about it after a while. It might become a hobby for someone who has just started being interested in photography, a direction for an amateur writer who tries to mimic the style of their favourite storytellers, and, finally, a job when a musician or an actor gains - whether deserved or not - popularity. Still, one question remains - is there a bigger dedication to art than making a living out of creating one's own? Is it possible for it to become an actual way of living, even if marked by being exposed to criticism or seclusion? If we take aesthetism, an artistic movement from the second half of the 19th century which also comprised of certain moral and intellectual values, into consideration, the answer most definitely will be 'yes'.
One of the most popular and significant personalities of that period of time, also associated with the term 'art for art's sake' and the insight into creating it described, was Oscar Wilde, an Irish playwriter and poet. A flamboyant personality, gifted with sense of humour ('There is only one thing in life worse than being popular, and that is not being popular.'), and fascinated with then-condemned, 'dark' behaviours like homosexuality, Wilde was a dandy, whose goal was to see the two - art and life - meet, and become truly intertwined, merging with each other, and whose way of living gathered a lot of rebuke and even disdain from the Victorian society.
His well-known novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, also depicts the coorelation between artism and reality. The main character does not exclude himself entirely from the society and, in fact, takes pleasure in being able to split his life between hedonistic unconcern and victorian prudishness, which reflects the author's own experiences. As stated in Nicholas Frankel's The Picture of Dorian Gray: An Annotated, Uncensored Edition: "In the wake of the Cleveland Street Scandal, Wilde had particular reason to be cautious in his published writings. Like Dorian, he was harbouring his own secrets. Since at least 1886, Wilde had been leading a secret double life, designed to conceal his sexual orientation and extramarital affairs from from close family members and "respectable" society." Mimicking this characteristic aesthetic rethoric of divided existence, Oscar Wilde describes events in Dorian's life, as well as his choices, that eximplify various obstacles preventing artistic vision from being fully conjoint with everyday life.
The novel begins with a preface dedicated to help the reader understand the novel, but also art in general, properly. It describes the artist as a creator dedicated to the sole beauty of their creation, rather than to being a moralist or a teacher, which is a clear reference to the 'art for art's sake' mantra. However, the novel gives an impression of being an ironic sight into the society, as there are, undoubtely, similarities between the plot and Wilde's life. Whether including the author's thinly-veiled outlook on victorian morality in the story was a deliberate process or not, it might leave the reader slightly confused, but also suggest that there is a kind of picture inside of a picture - an aesthetist's double life emerging in a form of contradiction between the preface and the rest of the novel.
On the first pages of the book, Dorian Gray's life is at the verge of change. Finding inspiration in his fascination with the young man's beauty, Basil Hallward decides to paint a portrait, not only to commemorate Dorian, but also to try to put into practise the new ways of artistic creation the painter has discovered under the influence of his subject. After the portrait has been completed, the boy, who has already encountered Lord Henry's views on life, differiating from Victorian characteristics, looks at the oil likeness of himself, and wishes that, instead of him, the portrait could face the inevitable consequences of passing time. However, it is not the fact of this scenario becoming reality, but Dorian's dream itself, that reveals another (yet first in the actual plot) moment of art being in a way separated from reality. It is no secret that every human being's physical beauty fades over time, and that most probably Wilde's main character was not the only young person that wished to stop this process - but the only one that succeded, as such desire can be fullfilled only in a world of fantasy, or in art, which, surely, also includes a novel. Music, poetry, sculpture - and paintings, are amongst numerous others artistic meanings of preserving, not necessary just human beauty, but the moment. While it is not possible to stop time, there are cenrtainly methods, in the world of art, to ensure that at least short excerpts from the past can be maintained and not forgotten.
Next, as James Esch words it in his essay, Notes on 'The Picture of Dorian Gray', "Rushing headlong into a love affair with Sibyl Vane, Dorian is influenced by her acting; and his romantic attachment and idolization influences her in ways Dorian never anticipated. In fact, she decides to sacrifice her art for the reality of his love, which is anethema to him." Sibyl, a young, but undoubtely talented actress, gets mentally detached from her performances, the distraction being a strong infatuation. Love is considered to be the biggest source of artistic inspiration - from ancient forms of paintings to popular songs on the radio, the stories of lovers have been told and shown countless times, but, obviously, not all of them picture positive themes or endings. One of the most popular tragic love tales, Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, is also being performed in the novel by Sibyl. The woman, rapt with her feelings for Dorian, cannot focus on the role, spoiling the play.
In this case, love embodies real life; it does not become an inspiration, but rather an obstacle in an artistic craft. Reality, whether in a form of feelings, or many different physical aspects, can deter a person from creating. Even though, with the exception of various generes of fantasy, the world surronding the creator is usually their strongest muse, art is fundamentally just one of many parts of human life, and more often than not, gets relegated to the background by the others.
The story of Sibyl Vane proceeds as Dorian decides not to continue his relationship with the actress, citing the downturn in her acting skills as the main reason. The deeply hurt and heartbroken woman decides to take her own life. Seeing Dorian's attitude towards Sibyl's death, Basil becomes aghast. The young man percieves the tragic event as an ultimate artistic expression, a tragic sacrifice. His demeanor might fit the aesthetic narrative, but only in his own eyes. The artistic perception, together with his hedonistic aspirations, seems to have deprived him of the ability to correctly understand the situation - his former lover's untimely death was not caused by an urge to create an image of a suffering performer, but by her pain itself. There was nothing romantic or tragically beautiful about her suicide; yet again, life has proven to alienate itself from the creator's world.
As time passes, the once beautiful portrait becomes notorious, changing with every of Dorian's bad deeds. It no longer pictures a beautiful young man, not even a little smirk the likeness has developed after Sibyl Vane's death. Oscar Wilde describes it as "some foul parody, some infamous, ignoble satire". The painting is now more like a mirror than ever before - but instead of the character's body, it reflects his soul. Portraits changing by themselves exist, of course, only in fiction, but an individual percieving and opinion on art are nothing sort of unreal. If the readers had a chance to see the portrait, as gruesome as it was by the end of Dorian's life, most of them would probably despise it, not putting a deeper thought into its author skills, and focusing only at the details of Gray's apperance. A question arises - does a creation deserve disdain solely because it pictures something repulsive? Is this another clash, another 'art versus life' situation, where something natural and ingrained in human brain, like general sense of beauty, makes some pieces of art seem less valuable, despite talent and dedication put into creating it?
The novel ends with the death of Dorian Gray. It was neither a sacrifice in the name of art, as he thought Sibyl's death to be, nor was it caused by opium or the character's lifestyle in general. Dorian, still as physically beautiful in his late thirties as years ago, becomes overwhelmed by guilt. After an internal battle between the desire to lead a sinless life and the unwillingness to admit to his mistakes, he furiously stabs the portrait. What is left is the painting being as astonishing as it was when Basil painted it, and a dead gnarled man lying on the floor - the real Dorian Gray. The life becomes what it is supposed to be - not free from harm and passing time, and so does art, unchanging, confined to its own world.
'Art for art's sake', living one's life as it was a play will definitely remain singature values of aesthetism. But they probably would not emerge without being triggered by something certainly opposite, like the ethics of Victorian society and rather rigorous norms of creating art. Hence the idea of double life, of remaining pure in a physical aspect, but provocative and sometimes even corrupt inside. This conflict was clearly visible in The Picture of Dorian Gray, where it was shown as the idea of art and life usually not being fully compatibile. Whereas creative process is most often inspired by reality, and way of living can also be devoted mostly to it, it is not possible to treat them as one combined matter - just like in case of aesthetists like Oscar Wilde, whose life is a great example of an artistic mind, who became even more salient as he was surronded by Victorian mentality and ethics.